I think that Miss Deering will be lucky to still be in a job.
1. Stating SISU made an offer for something they considered worthless, because it was a charity. Not good practice if you want to attract clients to invest in you in you're a hedge fund (even though it is clearly bollocks - Joy herslef has said she doesn't care about anyone other than her family).
2. Giving evidence on the negotiations between Seppala and Harris, then stating "“I don’t know the details of the conversations between Mr Harris and Ms Seppala.”. Why are you even being asked then? If you don't know the details, you're just offering opinion.
3. Asked about why Seppala had made a large offer for something 'worthless' and whether she was sentimental “She recognised the value of what the charity had given. I can’t answer that question.” Erm... isn't that an answer?
4. "Miss Deering also said that, while the charity had no legal obligation to continue negotiations with Sisu in good faith, it had a moral obligation to do so due to the fact the company had continued to fund Coventry City on the basis of a deal being done."
Is this then not her admitting that SISU were putting a gun to AHT head and threatening to ruin the football club unless they got their way? And why would the charity have a 'moral obligation' anyway just because SISu had threatened to cease CCFC funding - they've got nothing to do with that. What about the legal and moral obligation SISU have to support a business they have invested their clients money in?
If anyone still believed the nonsense about guaranteed funding for 5 years and a new stadium that's surely told you everything you need to know.
5."Miss Deering stated in the witness stand that she believed the original negotiations could be said to be “falling apart” after the exclusivity period had come to an end.
She said: “One of the reasons it fell apart was because of the charity. They wanted a different deal. They wanted cash up front.”
However, she went on to express the view that the deal could not be completely dead in the water as negotiations with Coventry City Council were continuing."
So, she admitted the exclusivity period HAD ended, and thus any legal right that went with them, and furthermore any reasonable person would expect any negotiations to be unsuccessful anyway, so any implied term is nonsense.
As for it not being completely dead because CCC were negotiating, so what? They're two completely separate organisations. If you're negotiating with someone to buy a share in something doesn't mean all the others with a share have to give you first dibs on theirs.
6. "Miss Deering also suggested that a decision to withhold football club rent from ACL would have been made by the football club and not Sisu."
And who tells those in charge of the football club what to do? Oh yes - SISU

Or if you prefer, Otium. And who tells Otium what to do? Either way, the decision always lands right back at SISU's door.